Dooley
Real Estate
______________________________________
Revaluation Revisited
Final thoughts
on Kent's property tax revaluation
Kent’s Board of Assessment Appeals has wrapped
up its work of evaluating the claims of property owners
who believed their new assessments to be too high.
After having worked with approximately two dozen property
owners who experienced sticker shock when they received
their original revaluation notices, we’re of
the opinion the Assessor and Vision Appraisal did
a substantially good job, but there are some troubling
elements in the template used in the revaluation process.
So what is this template? Basically, it’s a
set of standards that attempts to assign dollar values
to such elements as size of houses, lots, additional
acres, and extra features like outbuildings, swimming
pools, fireplaces, etc. These component values are
then applied to individual properties with adjustments
for such things as age and condition.
After reviewing dozens of new assessments, we found
that the template created by Vision works pretty well
for houses. If the recorded description of the house
(size, number of rooms, baths, etc.) is accurate,
the computerized valuation of the house is fairly
accurate. It’s the valuation of the land that
has caused the most problems.
The Vision template has two elements intended to
adjust differences in land values: the SA (site adjustment)
and the C (condition) Factor. The SA can be elevated
to raise the assumed unit price of the primary lot
from $120,000 per acre to a maximum of $420,000 per
acre if such things like views, mature trees, stone
walls and open meadow are present. The template reduces
the assessments of parcels compromised by wetlands
and severe slopes by means of the C Factor which is
expressed as a percentage reduction, typically 25
to 35%.
Yet another multiplier applied to land is the ST
(or street) Index. Ranging from 5 to 9, this factor
increases the land valuation from 0 to 100%, depending
upon the road on which the property is located. Granting
that real estate is all about “location, location
and location,” multiplying the land value for
all properties on a given road seems inappropriate
in a rural town where most roads have properties of
distinctly different quality from one end to the other.
That said, the Assessor and Vision are unlikely to
reduce an elevated Street Index unless several property
owners on the same road make a case for the reduction.
Finally, the Town budget was passed last Friday night.
The Board of Finance met afterwards and set a tax
rate of 14.11 mills. To calculate what this means
for your tax bill, simply multiply your new assessment
by .01411 and then compare the result with your current
tax bill. Generally speaking, if your assessment increased
by approximately 35%, your 2009/10 taxes should be
roughly the same as your current taxes.
Since the new assessments will be the basis for real
property taxes for the next five years, it makes sense
for property owners to review the nuts and bolts of
their property valuations to make sure that they’re
not paying an unfair premium for their address, and
if it appears they are, to seek to have the Street
Index modified next year.
We hope this has been helpful. If you have any questions,
feel free to call us.